YOUR FEEDBACK
IBM Buys Its Way Out of Antitrust Trouble
Plato wrote: L.L.Bean was never actually a customer of PSI. At most, they we...
SOA World Conference
Virtualization Conference
$50 Savings Expire June 24, 2008... – Register Today!


2007 West
GOLD SPONSORS:
Active Endpoints
Your SOA Needs BPEL for Orchestration
BEA
Virtualized SOA: Adaptive Infrastructure for Demanding Applications
Nexaweb
Overcoming Bandwidth Challenges with Nexaweb
TIBCO
What is Service Virtualization?
SILVER SPONSORS:
WSO2
Using Web Services Technologies and FOSS Solutions
Click For 2007 East
Event Webcasts

2008 East
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Appcelerator
Think Fast: Accelerate AJAX Development with Appcelerator
GOLD SPONSORS:
DreamFace Interactive
The Ultimate Framework for Creating Personalized Web 2.0 Mashups
ICEsoft
AJAX and Social Computing for the Enterprise
Kaazing
Enterprise Comet: Real–Time, Real–Time, or Real–Time Web 2.0?
Nexaweb
Now Playing: Desktop Apps in the Browser!
Sun
jMaki as an AJAX Mashup Framework
POWER PANELS:
The Business Value
of RIAs
What Lies Beyond AJAX?
KEYNOTES:
Douglas Crockford
Can We Fix the Web?
Anthony Franco
2008: The Year of the RIA
Click For 2007 Event Webcasts
SYS-CON.TV
TOP LINKS YOU MUST CLICK ON


Schwartz Attacks GPL; Sun Microsystems' Mention of "Stewardship" Has People Thinking of Java
Schwartz, Scott McNealy's Stand-in As Peck's Bad Boy, Slammed the GPL As Predatory Economic Imperialism

Digg This!

Sun has set up a Community Advisory Board (CAB) that's supposed to - in Sun's words - "steward the evolution of the OpenSolaris community towards self-governance." Whenever Sun starts talking about stewardship, people get edgy, remembering its tight grasp on Java.

This time through, people are pretty convinced Sun "doesn't get" open source - or doesn't want to. Murmuring is heard about Sun's stated intent to cherry pick any community changes made in the name of "OpenSolaris" and put them in a Sun-blessed, Sun-tested, Sun-supported, Sun-distributed Solaris "subset."

"This is not open source," says industry analyst Amy Wohl.

Sun, which has refused to open source Java on the grounds it might fork, maintains that there will only be a single OpenSolaris source tree.

However, the "community," Sun says, can create its own Solaris distributions.

Sun is suspected of simply wanting to thin the ranks of what it says are its 1,000 Solaris developers to substitute free labor and cut its overhead.

Sun has yet to post the OpenSolaris code though it was promised weeks ago. And it's not going to be Solaris 10. It's going to be Solaris 10.1, widgetry Sun has code named Nevada. How they differ is unclear.

The stuff is now due out by the end of the quarter under Sun's new Open Source Initiative-approved royalty-free Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), a variant of the Mozilla License that forbids putting Solaris code in Linux or connecting it to any GPL code to avoid having to put proprietary IP in the public domain.

Within hours of its CAB announcement, Sun president and COO Jonathan Schwartz, Scott McNealy's stand-in as Peck's Bad Boy, slammed the GPL as predatory economic imperialism while keynoting the Open Source Business Conference and said Sun would remain aloof from it.

Schwartz said the GPL, the touchstone of Linux and open source, "exports a form of IP colonialism to nations seeking to create their own means of production" and demand that they return their source code back to developed countries.

Anyway, to try to kick start an OpenSolaris community, Sun has recruited five people for the Community Advisory Board, whose job it is to work a governance model.

One of them at least has some prior experience. Roy Fielding, Day Software's chief scientist, was one of the co-founders and ex-chairman of the Apache Software Foundation, the highly regarded open source pioneer, where he more than brushed up against governance issues.

Sun has also recruited Al Hopper, a consultant engineer with Logical Approach, and Rich Teer, who wrote "Solaris Systems Programming."

Sun also stuck two of its own people on the CAB: chief technology evangelist Simon Phipps and senior staff engineer Casper Dik. Hmmm, Phipps.

The CAB is supposed to come up with a viable model by the end of the quarter, at least in draft. Sun said it had been piloting the community with 140 companies.

 

About Maureen O'Gara
Maureen O'Gara is the Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025.

Zac Stevens wrote: Quote: '''Murmuring is heard about Sun's stated intent to cherry pick any community changes made in the name of "OpenSolaris" and put them in a Sun-blessed, Sun-tested, Sun-supported, Sun-distributed Solaris "subset".''' As distinct from RedHat's stated intent to cherry pick any community changes made in the name of "Fedora" and put them in a RedHat-blessed, RedHat-tested, RedHat-supported, RedHat-distributed Fedora "subset", known as RedHat Enterprise Linux. I guess that is "not open source" either.
read & respond »
rm6990 wrote: " The stuff is now due out by the end of the quarter under Sun's new Open Source Initiative-approved royalty-free Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), a variant of the Mozilla License that forbids putting Solaris code in Linux or connecting it to any GPL code to avoid having to put proprietary IP in the public domain. " Almost stopped reading at this point. Honestly, could MOG get any dumber (I'm asking if it is possible)? GPL code is copyrighted...Public Domain code isn't. Anyone who doesn't know this should not be reporting on this type of stuff. I bet MOG is looking forward to her page hits when this gets posted by someone on Groklaw.
read & respond »
Maureen O'Gara wrote: Oh my, I just read Sun's CDDL license - it looks like I'm totally misinformed in what I wrote. I apologize, but I'm not paid to be accurate, I'm paid to generate web traffic. Oops, I did it again!
read & respond »
amused wrote: 5.10.1. On the off chance that you were willing to do some background research before posting unfounded FUD you would have found that 5.10.1 is the development version of Solaris, and is being made available as Solaris Express. Typing Solaris Express into google to look at the list of additions to Solaris 10 that are in 10.1 is left as an exercise for the author of the article. The attack on Simon Phipps is totatally unfounded, if he still worked for IBM would he be okay in your eyes? Do you in anyway understand the reasons why Java is under the JCP? Its not controlled by Sun btw. This article is nothing more than a troll. Perhaps a job as an editor on slashdot beckons?
read & respond »
Peter Tribble wrote: Oh dear. This article is arrogant, uninformed and inflammatory. It mixes rumour, hearsay, and made up opinions in the name of journalism. On usenet we would describe the author and article as a troll; being published in an online journal doesn't make it any different.
read & respond »
Rich Teer wrote: This article is so full of inaccuracies it needs a more detailed rebuttle (see my blog later). But to answer an00n's question: yes, anyone can use the CDDL for their own code. And no it doesn't need to be specifically fed back to Sun, although the source code must be made freely available to everyone. Yes, Jedidiah, SOlaris on x86 has historically been painful, but Solaris 10 is a huge leap better, and there are projects in the pipelines to make Solaris x86 an even better proposition. BTW, I run Solaris 10 on my Acer Ferrari 3400 laptop. And I am very pleased with the results.
read & respond »
an00n wrote: The comments Schwartz makes about the GPL sound more like Sun's CDDL - you can contribute changes to the code, but don't they have to go back to Sun? and you can't use the CDDL code for your own stuff can you?
read & respond »
jedidiah wrote: I'd much rather use non-open Solaris if I had to make the choice. Solaris on x86 has been historically painful. This is why many of us are Linux users despite having years of production experience with Solaris sparc or even Solaris x86.
read & respond »
ENTERPRISE OPEN SOURCE MAGAZINE LATEST STORIES . . .
Adobe's Kevin Lynch and Microsoft's Scott Guthrie to Keynote AJAX World RIA Conference & Expo
Two of the biggest launches in Rich Internet Application history took place in 2007/2008 when Adobe launched AIR 1.0 in February '08 and Microsoft launched Silverlight (September '07). At the 6th International AJAXWorld RIA Conference & Expo in October SYS-CON Events is delighted to be
MuleSource Releases Open Source SOA Governance Platform
MuleSource announced general availability of Mule Galaxy Enterprise, a new production-ready solution for storing and managing SOA artifacts offering new enterprise-class features such as clustering for high availability, an extensible query engine, and more. Mule Galaxy Enterprise, the
Oracle Updates Entire Family of Oracle Berkeley DB Embeddable Databases
Oracle announced new releases of Oracle Berkeley DB, Oracle Berkeley DB XML and Oracle Berkeley DB Java Edition. The new releases and enhancements signify Oracle's commitment to continued innovation across the Oracle Berkeley DB product family, while maintaining the open source dual li
Red Hat Expands Open Source Virtualization Applications
Open source applications provider Red Hat has introduced three applications targeting enterprise-wide adoption of next-generation virtualization. It has introduced embedded Linux Hypervisor for hosting virtualized Linux and Windows environments, which provide virtualization with improv
Red Hat Delivers on Linux Automation
Red Hat announced advancements that extend the Company's Linux Automation strategy by providing expanded capabilities and incorporating broadened community involvement for secure management of both users and systems across virtual and physical enterprise infrastructures.
Red Hat Numbers Up
Red Hat saw earnings rise 6.6% to $17.3 million, or eight cents a share in its first fiscal quarter ended May 31 on revenue up 32% year-over-year and 11% sequentially to $156.6 million. EPS was dead flat year-over-year. Subscription revenue was $130.7 million, up 27% year-over-year and
SUBSCRIBE TO THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NEWSLETTERS
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEEDS & GET YOUR SYS-CON NEWS LIVE!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021

SYS-CON FEATURED WHITEPAPERS

ADS BY GOOGLE